So I wrote this page and then decided to submit it to one of my motorcycle magazines that takes subscriptions from subscribers.
There is probably a 2% chance it will even get read, so I'll post it here in a few weeks after I haven't heard anything from them (for the 2 people that read this blog).
Saturday, October 20, 2012
Saturday, October 6, 2012
Motorcycle Touring (and a little Zen); What is needed?
I recently finished reading Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance by Robert Pirsig. This book now falls into the very small subset of books that I have read twice in my adult life. It would not normally have been a book I would have reread, but my boss gave me a copy shortly before I left for my motorcycle road trip out west.
I am actually glad I reread it. I read it the first time over eight years ago and I don't think I understood it. I know I didn't get the end. Spoiler alert! At the end, the victorious character is Phaedrus, not the more societally acceptable narrator. That changes the book a bit from what I remember of the first reading. I hope my boss didn't give it to me as a commentary on my mental state, but he may have.
To be honest, some of the philosophy parts of the book are a bit painful to read. But the motorcycle parts are fun and the break-up of both with the other makes for an interesting read. What made the book extra fun to read this time is my trip out west took me through many of the same areas mentioned in the book. Mobridge, South Dakota; Miles City, Montana; Missoula, Montana; Lolo, Montana. I can't help but wonder if the canyon the author sees in Oregon is the same one I stopped at. The book is semi-autobiographical and semi-fictional and likely much has changed since the author took his trip. But, maybe not.
I was affected by reading the afterword to learn that the real life Chris was murdered while still young...
Motorcycle touring might have changed since the book was written in 1974. Roads have changed, bikes have changed, and even travel has changed to a degree. So, I give Part One of a few posts on motorcycle touring (not sure if these will be consecutive). I've been traveling on two wheels for over 10 years now and my adventures have taken me through at least 37 states and well over 100,000 miles.
My Philosophy of motorcycle travel revolves around minimalism. This might sound silly coming from someone who owns a Goldwing (a bike big enough to have its own zip code) and an ST1300 (a baby wing), so I admit some hypocrisy here. Previous bikes I've used for touring include a Harley Davidson Electraglide and SuperGlide T-Sport. The T-Sport was one of Harley's truly great all-purpose bikes; it is too bad it only survived for a few years.
Almost any bike can be used for touring. It needs to be interstate legal and interstate capable. The two are not the same. A 250cc bike may be interstate legal, but the capability with two? people and a load may be questionable.
If I didn't do long distance, 2-up touring, I would not have a bike as big as the Goldwing. I do and I do enjoy it. As one fellow who I met on the Alaska highway said of the corider role, "That has to be the hardest job in the world." An uncomfortable passenger is a short ride. I actually like the ST1300 a little more for most solo trips though. I've often thought an "adventure" bike outfitted for the road (and not dirt) would make a great single tourer; sort of a modern version of what used to be a standard bike.
My personal preference is that a bike used for touring should be LOW maintenance. I will have a hard time going back to chain driven motorcycles. I get wrist pain on really long days so I really like having the option of factory cruise control. As much as I like two-lane roads, going on long stretches regardless of the road can be much more enjoyable with cruise control.
One thing I don't care about is a radio. My first bike that had a radio was my 2004 Electraglide. I envisioned listening to tunes for miles down the open road. I found out quickly that with only brief exceptions, I like the contemplative quiet (relative) much more.
I enjoy camping, but not on the bike. Camping is an end to itself. Camping is about doing almost nothing; taking all morning to make breakfast and clean up only to start making lunch a short time later.
I love riding early morning and this is antithetical to camping. Traffic is less. Evil RVs are still in the campgrounds, not destroying an otherwise nice road. After long days on the road, I'll gladly pay for a bed, my own bathroom and a shower. This allows for much lighter packing. Even though I have a Goldwing, I pack as if it was a much smaller bike.
I feel sorry for people who need to motorcycle tour with a trailer. When asked how I can survive for two weeks or more on the road I usually respond (semi) tongue in cheek that all I really need are a credit card and a pistol. A trailer ruins too much of the mobility of the bike. Humans don't have tails, bikes shouldn't either. I've also known several people who have had accidents or problems on the road as a direct result of trailers. Nope, not for me.
To be fair, I used to say the same thing about bikes like the Goldwing or Electraglide though.
There are a few and only a few bike specific necessities. Any major problem on a bike is likely going to need a tow. And while I have fixed some things on the road, what I normally take is a few hand tools appropriate for the bike. Don't bring an american wrench set if you ride a K1600GTL. The one thing that should be in every touring bike is a good tire plug kit and a small tire inflater. The Stop-n-Go plug kit is great. I've used the plugs successfully for thousands of miles, even though any plug should be considered temporary. CO2 cartridge inflators work, but they will run out. The CyclePump is a bulletproof air compressor which is extremely small, if a bit heavy.
Road clothes should be all day comfortable. Leather looks and smells good, but I prefer textiles over dead animal skin. I've settled on a waterproof coat with many vents. I have the TourMaster Transition but there are may similar jackets. These can be a bit pricey, but when the cost is amortized over thousands of miles they are almost free. I do not use the liners but instead carry a heavy flannel shirt. It packs lighter, serves the purpose of a liner and is dual use as a light jacket or cool weather clothes. On trips expecting colder weather, I also carry a fleece shirt. These pack up very small. Boots must be waterproof and comfortable as old friends. I'm sure I'm approaching if not exceeding 80,000 miles on my current pair and I will be very said when they eventually crack or otherwise break.
A rain suit is a must too. Use it too. Too often, I see approaching rain and think it isn't that bad. Being cold and wet is miserable. Just stop and put it on - he says to self.
Wear a helmet. Put all the hype about freedom, neck injuries and the thickness of the skull somewhere else. They are required in some states, don't pack well and once someone gets used to wearing it, not having it feels odd. Find one that is likable (or tolerable) and just wear it. I'll stand down from that soap box.
What else to pack? A few underclothes, a few t-shirts, a pair of shorts and a second pair of squishable shoes (I have cheap imitation Chuck Taylors). And, always bring a camera. Always. Don't forget the credit card and pistol. With those two things, access is granted to anything else needed.
That is pretty much all that is needed to tour. If someone is thinking about it, Do It!
Future posts on the topic:
Why travel by motorcycle
How to travel by motorcycle (this may not be as obvious as it sounds); life is an adventure
How motorcycle travel has changed over the last ten years and 37 states for me
I am actually glad I reread it. I read it the first time over eight years ago and I don't think I understood it. I know I didn't get the end. Spoiler alert! At the end, the victorious character is Phaedrus, not the more societally acceptable narrator. That changes the book a bit from what I remember of the first reading. I hope my boss didn't give it to me as a commentary on my mental state, but he may have.
To be honest, some of the philosophy parts of the book are a bit painful to read. But the motorcycle parts are fun and the break-up of both with the other makes for an interesting read. What made the book extra fun to read this time is my trip out west took me through many of the same areas mentioned in the book. Mobridge, South Dakota; Miles City, Montana; Missoula, Montana; Lolo, Montana. I can't help but wonder if the canyon the author sees in Oregon is the same one I stopped at. The book is semi-autobiographical and semi-fictional and likely much has changed since the author took his trip. But, maybe not.
I was affected by reading the afterword to learn that the real life Chris was murdered while still young...
Motorcycle touring might have changed since the book was written in 1974. Roads have changed, bikes have changed, and even travel has changed to a degree. So, I give Part One of a few posts on motorcycle touring (not sure if these will be consecutive). I've been traveling on two wheels for over 10 years now and my adventures have taken me through at least 37 states and well over 100,000 miles.
My Philosophy of motorcycle travel revolves around minimalism. This might sound silly coming from someone who owns a Goldwing (a bike big enough to have its own zip code) and an ST1300 (a baby wing), so I admit some hypocrisy here. Previous bikes I've used for touring include a Harley Davidson Electraglide and SuperGlide T-Sport. The T-Sport was one of Harley's truly great all-purpose bikes; it is too bad it only survived for a few years.
Almost any bike can be used for touring. It needs to be interstate legal and interstate capable. The two are not the same. A 250cc bike may be interstate legal, but the capability with two? people and a load may be questionable.
If I didn't do long distance, 2-up touring, I would not have a bike as big as the Goldwing. I do and I do enjoy it. As one fellow who I met on the Alaska highway said of the corider role, "That has to be the hardest job in the world." An uncomfortable passenger is a short ride. I actually like the ST1300 a little more for most solo trips though. I've often thought an "adventure" bike outfitted for the road (and not dirt) would make a great single tourer; sort of a modern version of what used to be a standard bike.
My personal preference is that a bike used for touring should be LOW maintenance. I will have a hard time going back to chain driven motorcycles. I get wrist pain on really long days so I really like having the option of factory cruise control. As much as I like two-lane roads, going on long stretches regardless of the road can be much more enjoyable with cruise control.
One thing I don't care about is a radio. My first bike that had a radio was my 2004 Electraglide. I envisioned listening to tunes for miles down the open road. I found out quickly that with only brief exceptions, I like the contemplative quiet (relative) much more.
I enjoy camping, but not on the bike. Camping is an end to itself. Camping is about doing almost nothing; taking all morning to make breakfast and clean up only to start making lunch a short time later.
I love riding early morning and this is antithetical to camping. Traffic is less. Evil RVs are still in the campgrounds, not destroying an otherwise nice road. After long days on the road, I'll gladly pay for a bed, my own bathroom and a shower. This allows for much lighter packing. Even though I have a Goldwing, I pack as if it was a much smaller bike.
I feel sorry for people who need to motorcycle tour with a trailer. When asked how I can survive for two weeks or more on the road I usually respond (semi) tongue in cheek that all I really need are a credit card and a pistol. A trailer ruins too much of the mobility of the bike. Humans don't have tails, bikes shouldn't either. I've also known several people who have had accidents or problems on the road as a direct result of trailers. Nope, not for me.
To be fair, I used to say the same thing about bikes like the Goldwing or Electraglide though.
There are a few and only a few bike specific necessities. Any major problem on a bike is likely going to need a tow. And while I have fixed some things on the road, what I normally take is a few hand tools appropriate for the bike. Don't bring an american wrench set if you ride a K1600GTL. The one thing that should be in every touring bike is a good tire plug kit and a small tire inflater. The Stop-n-Go plug kit is great. I've used the plugs successfully for thousands of miles, even though any plug should be considered temporary. CO2 cartridge inflators work, but they will run out. The CyclePump is a bulletproof air compressor which is extremely small, if a bit heavy.
Road clothes should be all day comfortable. Leather looks and smells good, but I prefer textiles over dead animal skin. I've settled on a waterproof coat with many vents. I have the TourMaster Transition but there are may similar jackets. These can be a bit pricey, but when the cost is amortized over thousands of miles they are almost free. I do not use the liners but instead carry a heavy flannel shirt. It packs lighter, serves the purpose of a liner and is dual use as a light jacket or cool weather clothes. On trips expecting colder weather, I also carry a fleece shirt. These pack up very small. Boots must be waterproof and comfortable as old friends. I'm sure I'm approaching if not exceeding 80,000 miles on my current pair and I will be very said when they eventually crack or otherwise break.
A rain suit is a must too. Use it too. Too often, I see approaching rain and think it isn't that bad. Being cold and wet is miserable. Just stop and put it on - he says to self.
Wear a helmet. Put all the hype about freedom, neck injuries and the thickness of the skull somewhere else. They are required in some states, don't pack well and once someone gets used to wearing it, not having it feels odd. Find one that is likable (or tolerable) and just wear it. I'll stand down from that soap box.
What else to pack? A few underclothes, a few t-shirts, a pair of shorts and a second pair of squishable shoes (I have cheap imitation Chuck Taylors). And, always bring a camera. Always. Don't forget the credit card and pistol. With those two things, access is granted to anything else needed.
That is pretty much all that is needed to tour. If someone is thinking about it, Do It!
Future posts on the topic:
Why travel by motorcycle
How to travel by motorcycle (this may not be as obvious as it sounds); life is an adventure
How motorcycle travel has changed over the last ten years and 37 states for me
Sunday, September 30, 2012
A Beagle Named Dixie
"Lightning hit that oak tree we've been looking at for years. And oh I know this summer we'll miss the shade. We just made it through the coldest winter we ever knew, and our old hound Dixie passed away."
From Lucky Man by Mark Chestnutt
Dixie was probably the sweetest dog I ever had. She was an amazing dog in spite of herself. Dixie was the dog that EVERYONE loved. Even people who did not like dogs liked Dixie. When I would joke that I had too many dogs and needed to get rid of some of them, there were an infinite number of people who instantly said they would take Dixie.
I know absolutely nothing about her young life. With the exception of brief spurts, Dixie was timid. Her time in the "wild" led her to know what to do with wild small animals, living or dead. The other dogs only saw chipmunks, squirrels, crayfish, whatever as toys, Dixie would play with them first, then proceed to treat them as snacks.
I wasn't really looking for a dog when I saw Dixie, but maybe I was; I already had three beagles. I was driving down a street near my house when I saw a small beagle run out in front of me. I looked at it in the rear view mirror and watched the school bus behind me nearly hit it. I couldn't let it continue to run down the street so I turned around and went back and got her. She was a little afraid of me, but came to me in short order. She was very grubby so I put her in the bed of my truck and went back home. En route, she tried to jump out. I stepped on the brake to stop her.
Once back at home, I wasn't sure I was going to keep her, so I put her in the small garage and ran the errands that I was originally out for. When I got home, I peeked in on her and she had made a perfect little beagle bed out of a pile of rope sitting on top of a straw bale I had. She was adorable and she had a new home.
She got along great with the other dogs and obviously had some house training. There might have been a few accidents, but they were rare. Given her small stature, I thought she was a puppy. When the vet told me she was likely four, I thought he meant months. I was shocked when he said years.
Dixie continued to fit in with the beagle clan. While I have had dogs that I could understand why someone got rid of, I could never understand how someone could have gotten rid of Dixie, she was that sweet. She had an odd way of sitting where her back legs would almost cross dantily.
As Dixie got older, she went from the diminutive "puppy" that I thought she was to a small dog and then to a fat dog. No matter what I fed her, she put on weight. She didn't like exercise, but was an enormous dog for how little she ate. The vet diagnosed her with a thyroid problem and she was put on Solixine for most of her adult life. This did allow her to eat more normally and loose weight, but she still enjoyed her nap time, especially on the couch.
Much later in life, she started to have seizures. Once again the miracle of modern veterinary medicine came to the rescue and for a few cents a day, the seizures stopped permanently. One side effect of this medicine was that it could make a dog lethargic. No difference was noticed.
As with just about any dog, she did occasionally get out, but it always seemed to be by accident, never an intentional leaving of the fenced area. I was always worried she would be kept by whoever found her when she did get out.
She was a joy to walk and almost never tugged on the leash, staying just a few steps behind. As with all older dogs, the walks got shorter and shorter as she aged. She acted old long before her time, seeing life with me as some sort of extended retirement.
For the last several years of her life, she could not handle stairs. She could go up them just fine, but going down stairs almost always resulted in a couple steps followed by a great tumble the rest of the way. It was a miracle she was never hurt. For many years, she would have to be carried down the deck stairs to do her business.
Then she would got back up the stairs to the back door and bark, she deserved to be let back in.
The steep stairs inside were always watched with one eye in case she tried to come down on her own.
Because she acted old, her aging wasn't very noticeable, but there were changes. She was always flight over fight so she had to be fed alone or she would loose her food. She never had accidents in the house, but required more attention. She began to absolutely hate the cold.
Eventually she got to the point where I just seemed to know the joy she brought the world was near and end. I was at a late day mandatory work function. As I sat there listening to the speakers, I just knew she had died. There was no doubt in my mind.
I was right.
I still miss Dixie. She died nearly the same time as Sammy which made it extra hard. Dixie was one of the few dogs Sammy still liked. Sammy and Dixie were buried together and a paw paw tree was planted over them.
"I'm living the life of a Lucky Man. Counting my blessings, holding your..." paw.
Sunday, September 23, 2012
A Beagle named Lucky
How does the joke go?
A man sees an acquaintance with his dog. The dog has bandages, is missing an eye, is limping, etc.
The man asks the owner what happened and the owner relates a few amazing tales of one-in-a-million shots resulting the dog's injuries. The questioner is astonished and asks the dogs name.
"Lucky." the owner responds.
My dog Lucky was a case of life imitating art - or at least that joke.
Lucky was not a very pretty dog. This is almost assuredly at least partially the result of a not very friendly beginning of life.
I don't know very much about the early part of his life, but he was found near where I worked (before I worked there). Our department secretary ended up taking him home where he became the family dog, or more particularly her son's dog.
What we know about his early life can be read in his appearance. His head was misproportioned as a result of injuries while young. He had an enormous overbite and oddly shaped eyes. Couple with this he had old-dog fat all his life, had coarse gnarly fur, walked with an odd gait and was never able to walk in a straight line. The overbite was his striking feature. It prevented him from eating normally and in order to drink he had to put is upper jaw on the rim of the bowl as he drank from the bowl.
A fish doesn't see the water he swims in so Lucky likely just saw himself as any other dog might.
He was Cheryl's family dog for a long time. When I bought the first house after moving to Ohio, I needed a refrigerator. Cheryl said they had one to offer for free. I found out around the time I went to get it that they were getting rid of it due to the sale of the house as a result of an impending divorce.
When I went to get the fridge, I had Mandy and Sammy in the truck with me. Apparently after leaving with the appliance, they had discussions around my taking of their beagle. Due to the divorce and subsequent split and move, Lucky needed a new home.
We got a refrigerator and it came with a dog.
After a short visit to see how the three dogs would get along, Lucky came to live at the new house in early February. Lucky wasn't so sure what to make of the change. He had never lived with other dogs and due to the confusion, didn't want to be left alone.
Within a day or so of getting Lucky, I had an unwanted day off when torrential rain came along with melting snow and flooded the basement severely. This is before several (successful) efforts were taken to mitigate the flood-prone basement.
The house was a Victorian with eight foot windows in the front. Several of the windows weren't in prime condition and a couple panes were cracked. On this flood day, as I went out to get the mail, I heard glass breaking a turned around to see Lucky trying to get to me through the pane that had gone from cracked to broken as a result of his efforts. I hurried back inside to prevent him from cutting himself on the broken glass.
Plugged gutters are a pet peeve of mine and later that same day, I opened a second story window to get on the kitchen roof and unplug the lower gutters there. After hearing a noise, I turned around to see Lucky standing unsteadily on the roof looking at me.
Remember the joke about the dog named Lucky?
Once the initial shock of his new life wore off, Lucky became of the pack. Three dogs, soon to be four.
He was not a young dog and accepted this new living situation, but never really embracing it or understanding it. As such, he developed an aloof nature I've rarely seen in other dogs. This extended to most of his dog's life.
At this point in life, I was doing a lot of camping for recreation. Lucky took to the tent well, but his aloof nature went along with him. While camping at Old Man's Cave in Eastern Ohio, I recall one time when there was a group of us hiking while towing the dogs along on leashes. Lucky, seeing no reason to stop happily walked along the trail and while merrily pooping along. "Luckily" I saw this and was able to clean the material off the trail so as not to spoil any one else's hike.
His aloof nature meant that he was never my favorite dog, but he was a wonderful dog at the same time. Never flashy, but always there. He didn't chase and attack squirrels, didn't really like toys and was never very needy.
His one passion was licking his front feet. Something he did a lot, and nothing could really stop it.
As he got older, he didn't exactly age gracefully. His crooked walk got worse and his breath and eating would at times be odd. Knowing something was going wrong, he went to the vet where a biopsy confirmed he had cancer in his head, spreading to his jaw.
He had to have his teeth removed, but this never really bothered him. His jaw was so odd anyway, the teeth were merely grotesque decoration. For a long time he showed no evidence of discomfort, so I let him be a dog.
Predictably, things eventually took a turn for the worse. Toward the end, he went blind. I think to Lucky, this was just another event in his topsy life. He figured out that if he bumped into something but could put his head on it, it must be a step so he should walk up it. He was actually able to navigate well with this assumption, but this resulted in his climbing on lots of stuff and resulting in much confusion. Stacks of magazine continually knocked over, potted plants tipped with dirt all over.
Feeding became harder. With his misshapen head, he needed daily help to "see" his food and get it out of his bowl. This was more than just setting him in front of it to eat.
As he continued to age and deteriorate, he began regularly to relieve himself indoors. I'm amazed that even healthy dogs can hold it as long as we sometimes ask them to so daily clean-up was part of having Lucky. Daily moppings resulted in a very clean kitchen floor (at least parts of it).
I thought Lucky was actually improving at one point only to realize he had stopped even getting out of his bed anymore. Lucky had his own special bed, separate from the other dogs. This was his one constant in life.
I knew it was time.
As I drove him to the vet, I felt as bad as I've ever felt. He is the only dog I've had to have put down. I felt like I was signing a death warrant and almost turned around, but it was time - if not past it. He was not comfortable, and not really even a dog anymore; not really living as a dog should.
When it was over, I was beside myself with what I had done. I left quickly without saying anything or even paying the vet. As hard as it was, intellectually I know it was the right thing to do.
Lucky was buried in the back yard in his special red, white and black blanket. A flowering crab apple tree was planted above him. Every spring, the tree flowered abundantly. Showing his aloof nature, the tree which was supposed to never bear fruit annually delivered a huge crop of crab apples; showing the tree had absorbed Lucky, it never grew strait, but constantly crooked.
Lucky's life started out pretty hard. He had a great life with Cheryl, and retired with me.
After he died, I received very nice cards from Cheryl and her ex-husband. I still have those cards today. The vet also sent me a copy of Rainbow Bridge - a poem for anyone who has lost a furry friend.
The Rainbow Bridge
There is a bridge connecting heaven and Earth. It is called The
A man sees an acquaintance with his dog. The dog has bandages, is missing an eye, is limping, etc.
The man asks the owner what happened and the owner relates a few amazing tales of one-in-a-million shots resulting the dog's injuries. The questioner is astonished and asks the dogs name.
"Lucky." the owner responds.
My dog Lucky was a case of life imitating art - or at least that joke.
Lucky was not a very pretty dog. This is almost assuredly at least partially the result of a not very friendly beginning of life.
I don't know very much about the early part of his life, but he was found near where I worked (before I worked there). Our department secretary ended up taking him home where he became the family dog, or more particularly her son's dog.
What we know about his early life can be read in his appearance. His head was misproportioned as a result of injuries while young. He had an enormous overbite and oddly shaped eyes. Couple with this he had old-dog fat all his life, had coarse gnarly fur, walked with an odd gait and was never able to walk in a straight line. The overbite was his striking feature. It prevented him from eating normally and in order to drink he had to put is upper jaw on the rim of the bowl as he drank from the bowl.
A fish doesn't see the water he swims in so Lucky likely just saw himself as any other dog might.
He was Cheryl's family dog for a long time. When I bought the first house after moving to Ohio, I needed a refrigerator. Cheryl said they had one to offer for free. I found out around the time I went to get it that they were getting rid of it due to the sale of the house as a result of an impending divorce.
When I went to get the fridge, I had Mandy and Sammy in the truck with me. Apparently after leaving with the appliance, they had discussions around my taking of their beagle. Due to the divorce and subsequent split and move, Lucky needed a new home.
We got a refrigerator and it came with a dog.
After a short visit to see how the three dogs would get along, Lucky came to live at the new house in early February. Lucky wasn't so sure what to make of the change. He had never lived with other dogs and due to the confusion, didn't want to be left alone.
Within a day or so of getting Lucky, I had an unwanted day off when torrential rain came along with melting snow and flooded the basement severely. This is before several (successful) efforts were taken to mitigate the flood-prone basement.
The house was a Victorian with eight foot windows in the front. Several of the windows weren't in prime condition and a couple panes were cracked. On this flood day, as I went out to get the mail, I heard glass breaking a turned around to see Lucky trying to get to me through the pane that had gone from cracked to broken as a result of his efforts. I hurried back inside to prevent him from cutting himself on the broken glass.
Plugged gutters are a pet peeve of mine and later that same day, I opened a second story window to get on the kitchen roof and unplug the lower gutters there. After hearing a noise, I turned around to see Lucky standing unsteadily on the roof looking at me.
Remember the joke about the dog named Lucky?
Once the initial shock of his new life wore off, Lucky became of the pack. Three dogs, soon to be four.
He was not a young dog and accepted this new living situation, but never really embracing it or understanding it. As such, he developed an aloof nature I've rarely seen in other dogs. This extended to most of his dog's life.
At this point in life, I was doing a lot of camping for recreation. Lucky took to the tent well, but his aloof nature went along with him. While camping at Old Man's Cave in Eastern Ohio, I recall one time when there was a group of us hiking while towing the dogs along on leashes. Lucky, seeing no reason to stop happily walked along the trail and while merrily pooping along. "Luckily" I saw this and was able to clean the material off the trail so as not to spoil any one else's hike.
His aloof nature meant that he was never my favorite dog, but he was a wonderful dog at the same time. Never flashy, but always there. He didn't chase and attack squirrels, didn't really like toys and was never very needy.
His one passion was licking his front feet. Something he did a lot, and nothing could really stop it.
As he got older, he didn't exactly age gracefully. His crooked walk got worse and his breath and eating would at times be odd. Knowing something was going wrong, he went to the vet where a biopsy confirmed he had cancer in his head, spreading to his jaw.
He had to have his teeth removed, but this never really bothered him. His jaw was so odd anyway, the teeth were merely grotesque decoration. For a long time he showed no evidence of discomfort, so I let him be a dog.
Predictably, things eventually took a turn for the worse. Toward the end, he went blind. I think to Lucky, this was just another event in his topsy life. He figured out that if he bumped into something but could put his head on it, it must be a step so he should walk up it. He was actually able to navigate well with this assumption, but this resulted in his climbing on lots of stuff and resulting in much confusion. Stacks of magazine continually knocked over, potted plants tipped with dirt all over.
Feeding became harder. With his misshapen head, he needed daily help to "see" his food and get it out of his bowl. This was more than just setting him in front of it to eat.
As he continued to age and deteriorate, he began regularly to relieve himself indoors. I'm amazed that even healthy dogs can hold it as long as we sometimes ask them to so daily clean-up was part of having Lucky. Daily moppings resulted in a very clean kitchen floor (at least parts of it).
I thought Lucky was actually improving at one point only to realize he had stopped even getting out of his bed anymore. Lucky had his own special bed, separate from the other dogs. This was his one constant in life.
I knew it was time.
As I drove him to the vet, I felt as bad as I've ever felt. He is the only dog I've had to have put down. I felt like I was signing a death warrant and almost turned around, but it was time - if not past it. He was not comfortable, and not really even a dog anymore; not really living as a dog should.
When it was over, I was beside myself with what I had done. I left quickly without saying anything or even paying the vet. As hard as it was, intellectually I know it was the right thing to do.
Lucky was buried in the back yard in his special red, white and black blanket. A flowering crab apple tree was planted above him. Every spring, the tree flowered abundantly. Showing his aloof nature, the tree which was supposed to never bear fruit annually delivered a huge crop of crab apples; showing the tree had absorbed Lucky, it never grew strait, but constantly crooked.
Lucky's life started out pretty hard. He had a great life with Cheryl, and retired with me.
After he died, I received very nice cards from Cheryl and her ex-husband. I still have those cards today. The vet also sent me a copy of Rainbow Bridge - a poem for anyone who has lost a furry friend.
The Rainbow Bridge
There is a bridge connecting heaven and Earth. It is called The
Rainbow Bridge because of its many colors. Just this side of The
Rainbow Bridge there is a land of meadows, hills and valleys
with lush green grass.
When a beloved pet dies, it goes to this place. There is always
food and water and warm spring weather. The old and frail
animals are young again. Those who are maimed are made
whole again. They play all day with each other.
food and water and warm spring weather. The old and frail
animals are young again. Those who are maimed are made
whole again. They play all day with each other.
There is only one thing missing. They are not with their special
person who loved them on earth. So each day they run and play
until the day comes when one of them suddenly stops playing and
looks up! The nose twitches! The ears are up! The eyes are staring!
And this one suddenly runs from the group.
person who loved them on earth. So each day they run and play
until the day comes when one of them suddenly stops playing and
looks up! The nose twitches! The ears are up! The eyes are staring!
And this one suddenly runs from the group.
You have been seen, and when you and your special friend meet, you
take him or her in your arms and embrace. Your face is covered with
kisses, and you look once more into the eyes of your trusting pet.
take him or her in your arms and embrace. Your face is covered with
kisses, and you look once more into the eyes of your trusting pet.
Then you both cross over The Rainbow Bridge together, never again
to be separated.
to be separated.
Saturday, September 15, 2012
One (and only one) Vacation Picture
I just recently got back from vacation. It was a cross-country motorcycle road trip. Before the trip I bought a new Panasonic FZ150. I love the new camera but to be honest, I didn't take any pictures that my old Kodak superzoom couldn't have taken. I did get to use some of the newer features of the camera though.
Many of the pictures of the trip were not taken with the FZ150 however, but with the old Nikon pocket camera. More on that in a bit.
I have a friend who originally got me interested in photography. He is by far a better photographer than I am and has much better equipment. His interest is portrait photography. Portrait photography is fiction. I hope it doesn't need to be said that this is not a bad thing, there is a lot of written fiction that is very good.
Some portrait photography is bad fiction. I can recall seeing family pictures (some that I'm in) with synthetic backgrounds, a wagon wheel in the background. Fake smiles with just as fake trees in the celluloid pull-down screen. Smiles covering unpleasantness with an approximation of a library out of focus behind. Horrid. I'd like to believe "family" portraits have universally gotten better in the last 40 years, but I won't hold my breath.
My friend has some pictures that are amazing. But, they are composed pictures and people wearing clothes they would not otherwise wear, in situations and poses that they would not be in if not for the camera. This is fiction.
At one time, I helped him with lighting as he was doing a shoot of models. One of the models was frankly not very attractive. Heroin sheek gone bad. The pictures of her were very flattering. I was amazed when I saw them. She, along with several other models had aspirations of law school. I'd bet anything it hasn't happened...for any of them.
On my recent vacation, many areas with gorgeous scenery were traversed. The Bitteroots and the Cascades were amazing. At the risk of taking an analogy too far, landscape photography is akin to documentary. It can be stunning, powerful, but also painfully boring. Ken Burns can take a great 2 hour informational movie and compress it into 14 long painful hours.
In my earlier motorcycle travels, many scenic pullouts where stopped at for pictures. After traveling all over North America for more than 10 years now, the scenery is still as stunning, but it begins to fall flat in pictures. No two mountains look the same, but the pictures in retrospect often do. Canyons, lakes, rivers, oceans and bluffs are all worthy of pictures but they can get somewhat redundant.
There were some amazing landscape shots taken on the trip. But looking at endless landscape photos of another person's vacation is like watching home movies (documentaries) about another person's children. It gets old quick.
Often, scenery can't be taken in by a picture. I love the big empty of western Dakotas and eastern Montana, but pictures don't do the expanse justice - even panoramas. I have found that pictures with a flat road running through them do give the feeling that exists when in these big empty areas. I have many pictures like this taken from the motorcycle while going down the road. I have a hard time deciding which I like better, but I'm probably alone in that respect.
But the picture that captures the vacation wasn't from one of these scenic areas. It happened at the Pacific Ocean, in Seaside, Oregon. I had just had my picture taken touching the Pacific Ocean and was walking back. A picture was taken that I didn't know about, and it caught me in one of those serene carefree moments rarely repeated.
The scene was near the apex of the trip. Physically about as far from home as I got on the trip. More importantly, metaphorically it was about as far from home as I got as well. The moment the camera caught me could be thought of as in complete apathy but not in a negative way. Relaxed without trying.
I wasn't sure if I should post the picture. Technically it is terrible. The late-day low-angle sunlight shrouds half my face in shadows. The people in the background are distracting. I'm in it and I do not like having my picture taken. On a motorcycle there is only room for so much clothes so I'm wearing atypical beach clothes; cargo shorts and a slightly grubby t-shirt, socks and cheapo imitation Chuck Taylor's.
Anybody looking through a stack of pictures would not give a second glance to this picture, and it isn't even one of my favorites. It probably is the picture I've gone back to more often though.
The moment that picture was taken though can't be repeated. It would not be possible to compose the moment in a portrait. It is a representation, a snapshot, of why vacation exists at all.
It is non-fiction. Like any non-fiction, it can help put reality in perspective - hopefully.
Many of the pictures of the trip were not taken with the FZ150 however, but with the old Nikon pocket camera. More on that in a bit.
I have a friend who originally got me interested in photography. He is by far a better photographer than I am and has much better equipment. His interest is portrait photography. Portrait photography is fiction. I hope it doesn't need to be said that this is not a bad thing, there is a lot of written fiction that is very good.
Some portrait photography is bad fiction. I can recall seeing family pictures (some that I'm in) with synthetic backgrounds, a wagon wheel in the background. Fake smiles with just as fake trees in the celluloid pull-down screen. Smiles covering unpleasantness with an approximation of a library out of focus behind. Horrid. I'd like to believe "family" portraits have universally gotten better in the last 40 years, but I won't hold my breath.
My friend has some pictures that are amazing. But, they are composed pictures and people wearing clothes they would not otherwise wear, in situations and poses that they would not be in if not for the camera. This is fiction.
At one time, I helped him with lighting as he was doing a shoot of models. One of the models was frankly not very attractive. Heroin sheek gone bad. The pictures of her were very flattering. I was amazed when I saw them. She, along with several other models had aspirations of law school. I'd bet anything it hasn't happened...for any of them.
On my recent vacation, many areas with gorgeous scenery were traversed. The Bitteroots and the Cascades were amazing. At the risk of taking an analogy too far, landscape photography is akin to documentary. It can be stunning, powerful, but also painfully boring. Ken Burns can take a great 2 hour informational movie and compress it into 14 long painful hours.
In my earlier motorcycle travels, many scenic pullouts where stopped at for pictures. After traveling all over North America for more than 10 years now, the scenery is still as stunning, but it begins to fall flat in pictures. No two mountains look the same, but the pictures in retrospect often do. Canyons, lakes, rivers, oceans and bluffs are all worthy of pictures but they can get somewhat redundant.
There were some amazing landscape shots taken on the trip. But looking at endless landscape photos of another person's vacation is like watching home movies (documentaries) about another person's children. It gets old quick.
Often, scenery can't be taken in by a picture. I love the big empty of western Dakotas and eastern Montana, but pictures don't do the expanse justice - even panoramas. I have found that pictures with a flat road running through them do give the feeling that exists when in these big empty areas. I have many pictures like this taken from the motorcycle while going down the road. I have a hard time deciding which I like better, but I'm probably alone in that respect.
But the picture that captures the vacation wasn't from one of these scenic areas. It happened at the Pacific Ocean, in Seaside, Oregon. I had just had my picture taken touching the Pacific Ocean and was walking back. A picture was taken that I didn't know about, and it caught me in one of those serene carefree moments rarely repeated.
The scene was near the apex of the trip. Physically about as far from home as I got on the trip. More importantly, metaphorically it was about as far from home as I got as well. The moment the camera caught me could be thought of as in complete apathy but not in a negative way. Relaxed without trying.
I wasn't sure if I should post the picture. Technically it is terrible. The late-day low-angle sunlight shrouds half my face in shadows. The people in the background are distracting. I'm in it and I do not like having my picture taken. On a motorcycle there is only room for so much clothes so I'm wearing atypical beach clothes; cargo shorts and a slightly grubby t-shirt, socks and cheapo imitation Chuck Taylor's.
Anybody looking through a stack of pictures would not give a second glance to this picture, and it isn't even one of my favorites. It probably is the picture I've gone back to more often though.
The moment that picture was taken though can't be repeated. It would not be possible to compose the moment in a portrait. It is a representation, a snapshot, of why vacation exists at all.
It is non-fiction. Like any non-fiction, it can help put reality in perspective - hopefully.
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Panasonic Lumix FZ150
And the winner is...
A few weeks ago, I was in the process of deciding what new camera I wanted to buy. I had decided on the Fuji HS30. Shortly after that, I took a short motorcycle trip which gives me lots of time to think on roads I've been on many times. I noodled over the differences in the cameras and decided many of the descriptions of the HS30 had one troubling feature - that the focus could be slow. Several reviews called it lazy. After looking into the hard numbers for focus and lock times, I changed my mind and bought the Panasonic Lumix FZ150. I think I would have been happy with the HS30 and I really like that it has a manual zoom, but so far, the FZ150 has met my expectations.
My picture taking falls into three categories.
1. Candid shots with friends or at family gatherings, etc. I really think the best option here is a quality point and shoot. The small sensor allows for a broad depth of field and the camera can be handed to anyone to take pictures. Cost is low and if it is dropped or broken it is not a big loss.
An SLR is an OK option, but cost is high and the large sensor can be a negative at times with a too-narrow depth of field. The super-zoom is an adequate option filling the definition of a bridge camera.
Candid pictures of the dogs show the FZ150 is perfectly capable here with fast focus times and very good resolution. The picture below is of Jackson lounging in the back yard.
2. Vacation photos. A small point and shoot runs into problems for anything but the relatively close shots. SLR cameras are great for this IF you are willing to lug around a few lenses and have the tenacity to bring them with you when venturing away from the storage capacity of a motor vehicle. But, here is where the super-zoom or bridge camera shines. Good resolution, light weight, easy to carry and sufficient zoom to compose pictures well.
Since much of my vacationing is hunting or with limited capacity of what I can store in my motorcycle saddle bags, the super-zoom makes most sense for me.
I'll be going on vacation soon and will have more of an opportunity to test the FZ150 in this capacity. I really wish I had played with the High Dynamic Range (HDR) capability of the Panasonic for the picture above, but there will be other opportunities for that in the future.
It is the gunner, not the gun... Vacation pictures are also where composition makes the difference between a great picture and a painful one. In 2009 I went bear hunting. While getting pictures taken with my bear, I gave my camera to Ed. His pictures were not bad, they were terrible. How anyone can take a point and shoot camera and take such terrible pictures is beyond me. Every shot was poorly framed. Luckily, Stan took some good pictures to capture the event.
I've also seen pictures of friends vacations where every picture is a close-up of a person. These could commemorate the occasion, but they might as well be taken in the back yard.
I have at times gone to great lengths to get the right vacation picture. There is one extreme example of this. In 2008 I rode my motorcycle to Alaska. On the way north, there was a place where I was able to get a great picture of the Alaska Highway. After viewing the picture later however, the light was just not right and the drain tile in the frame was distracting.
On the way into Southeastern Alaska nearly a week later, I backtracked hundreds of miles to retake the picture. The light was near perfect and the composed shot was wonderful. I'm very glad I had the time and took the time to do this as it has to be one of the best pictures of that entire trip.
3. Pictures for sake of photography. These are the pictures that I take just for the fun of it. Cropping is cheating and anything beyond minor post photograph manipulation is also wrong. I might even call them art. Often, I see a picture on-line, in a magazine or anywhere and it sparks an idea of what I would like to try. Here, an SLR is by far the best choice if one is willing to invest in many lenses. As I mentioned a few weeks ago, I still have my Pentax K1000, but the benefits of digital photography means it stays in the closet unused. I still wish someone would make a less expensive digital fully manual student camera compatible with old lenses (these can often be bought on the cheap). Alas, I doubt this will happen. The super-zoom is an adequate choice for this and more than adequate as long as there is enough light. To quote a letter to the British Journal of photography from 1880, "This new fangled idea of ready-made plates takes all the fun out of photography. The next stage might be a shop to produce prints and lantern slides to order -- but that is too distressing to anticipate." This is not a new issue for a Luddite.
Compared to other digital non-SLR cameras I have used, the focus times on the FZ150 are excellent. At wide angle, the lock time is near instantaneous. I've been desperately trying to get a picture of one of the hummingbirds in the Rose of Sharon bush near the house. I still have not succeeded in getting a good one, but I can't blame the camera for that. This picture was taken through the screen in the front window. The picture is not that good, but does demonstrate the ability of the Panasonic to focus quickly in a challenging environment.
I love macro photography. The FZ150 does a great job in this, much better than I expected. Wide angle focusing is approximately 1cm. It has a 52mm lense thread which accepts filters. This is great since I have 52mm macro filters which allow very close focusing even at longer zoom ranges. There is some vignetting, but I can accept that for the flexibility this allows during composed pictures.
Yesterday, I planted some paw paw trees that I had started from seeds. This morning was one of the first dewy fall-like mornings of the year which allowed a great opportunity to capture the small plants in low angle sunrise light.
So what don't I like about the camera? Everything in life is a trade-off. Everything.
The manual controls are not as easy as they could be. This is somewhat offset by the abilities of the Program mode of the camera. There should be easier access to the ISO setting in full manual mode and a faster method to access all functionality after the controls disappear from the screen.
I don't fully understand the flash use on this camera and the manual does not describe it very well. It works flawlessly in fully automatic mode, but in the more creative modes it is a little obtuse. So far, I tend to get overexposed shots when using the fill flash mode (not in full auto though). I'm sure I'll figure this out. In the interim, Intelligent Automatic mode works well for this.
I originally ordered the camera from an East Coast vendor who had a price a little better than amazon.com. Several days after ordering it, I still had not received notice that it shipped. Only after I contacted them did they inform me that they were no longer carrying this (popular) camera as the FZ200 had just been announced. I found it odd that the FZ150 would not be sold as it is likely months until the FZ200 will be readily available. The advancement of the FZ200 camera is a full f2.8 throughout the zoom range which is quite an optical engineering feat. As there is no such thing as "best" I decided not to wait for this option which would have taken at least months to get and cost approximately $200 more.
As of now, I'm happy with my purchase of the Lumix FZ150. It does what it advertised and does it very well. I may have been just as happy with any of the other options, but as I was still relatively happy with my old super-zoom, I anticipate many good pictures from the Panasonic.
Vacation is only a few weeks away. This will be a true test of the camera to perform as well as a robustness test as it bounces around the country in a saddle bag through whatever weather I can find.
My picture taking falls into three categories.
1. Candid shots with friends or at family gatherings, etc. I really think the best option here is a quality point and shoot. The small sensor allows for a broad depth of field and the camera can be handed to anyone to take pictures. Cost is low and if it is dropped or broken it is not a big loss.
An SLR is an OK option, but cost is high and the large sensor can be a negative at times with a too-narrow depth of field. The super-zoom is an adequate option filling the definition of a bridge camera.
Candid pictures of the dogs show the FZ150 is perfectly capable here with fast focus times and very good resolution. The picture below is of Jackson lounging in the back yard.
On an extreme crop into his back, we can see the even though this is a picture taken at a moderate zoom, the resolution is more than adequate to see individual hairs on his back. This is pretty impressive.
2. Vacation photos. A small point and shoot runs into problems for anything but the relatively close shots. SLR cameras are great for this IF you are willing to lug around a few lenses and have the tenacity to bring them with you when venturing away from the storage capacity of a motor vehicle. But, here is where the super-zoom or bridge camera shines. Good resolution, light weight, easy to carry and sufficient zoom to compose pictures well.
Since much of my vacationing is hunting or with limited capacity of what I can store in my motorcycle saddle bags, the super-zoom makes most sense for me.
It is the gunner, not the gun... Vacation pictures are also where composition makes the difference between a great picture and a painful one. In 2009 I went bear hunting. While getting pictures taken with my bear, I gave my camera to Ed. His pictures were not bad, they were terrible. How anyone can take a point and shoot camera and take such terrible pictures is beyond me. Every shot was poorly framed. Luckily, Stan took some good pictures to capture the event.
I've also seen pictures of friends vacations where every picture is a close-up of a person. These could commemorate the occasion, but they might as well be taken in the back yard.
I have at times gone to great lengths to get the right vacation picture. There is one extreme example of this. In 2008 I rode my motorcycle to Alaska. On the way north, there was a place where I was able to get a great picture of the Alaska Highway. After viewing the picture later however, the light was just not right and the drain tile in the frame was distracting.
3. Pictures for sake of photography. These are the pictures that I take just for the fun of it. Cropping is cheating and anything beyond minor post photograph manipulation is also wrong. I might even call them art. Often, I see a picture on-line, in a magazine or anywhere and it sparks an idea of what I would like to try. Here, an SLR is by far the best choice if one is willing to invest in many lenses. As I mentioned a few weeks ago, I still have my Pentax K1000, but the benefits of digital photography means it stays in the closet unused. I still wish someone would make a less expensive digital fully manual student camera compatible with old lenses (these can often be bought on the cheap). Alas, I doubt this will happen. The super-zoom is an adequate choice for this and more than adequate as long as there is enough light. To quote a letter to the British Journal of photography from 1880, "This new fangled idea of ready-made plates takes all the fun out of photography. The next stage might be a shop to produce prints and lantern slides to order -- but that is too distressing to anticipate." This is not a new issue for a Luddite.
Compared to other digital non-SLR cameras I have used, the focus times on the FZ150 are excellent. At wide angle, the lock time is near instantaneous. I've been desperately trying to get a picture of one of the hummingbirds in the Rose of Sharon bush near the house. I still have not succeeded in getting a good one, but I can't blame the camera for that. This picture was taken through the screen in the front window. The picture is not that good, but does demonstrate the ability of the Panasonic to focus quickly in a challenging environment.
I love macro photography. The FZ150 does a great job in this, much better than I expected. Wide angle focusing is approximately 1cm. It has a 52mm lense thread which accepts filters. This is great since I have 52mm macro filters which allow very close focusing even at longer zoom ranges. There is some vignetting, but I can accept that for the flexibility this allows during composed pictures.
So what don't I like about the camera? Everything in life is a trade-off. Everything.
The manual controls are not as easy as they could be. This is somewhat offset by the abilities of the Program mode of the camera. There should be easier access to the ISO setting in full manual mode and a faster method to access all functionality after the controls disappear from the screen.
I don't fully understand the flash use on this camera and the manual does not describe it very well. It works flawlessly in fully automatic mode, but in the more creative modes it is a little obtuse. So far, I tend to get overexposed shots when using the fill flash mode (not in full auto though). I'm sure I'll figure this out. In the interim, Intelligent Automatic mode works well for this.
I originally ordered the camera from an East Coast vendor who had a price a little better than amazon.com. Several days after ordering it, I still had not received notice that it shipped. Only after I contacted them did they inform me that they were no longer carrying this (popular) camera as the FZ200 had just been announced. I found it odd that the FZ150 would not be sold as it is likely months until the FZ200 will be readily available. The advancement of the FZ200 camera is a full f2.8 throughout the zoom range which is quite an optical engineering feat. As there is no such thing as "best" I decided not to wait for this option which would have taken at least months to get and cost approximately $200 more.
Vacation is only a few weeks away. This will be a true test of the camera to perform as well as a robustness test as it bounces around the country in a saddle bag through whatever weather I can find.
Sunday, August 5, 2012
A Beagle Named Sammy
It is fitting to write about Sammy right after Mandy. They were siblings. Separated in age by many years. No, there was probably no genetics shared between them, but those two misfits loved each other one minute, then fought to blood the next, exactly like human siblings.
Sammy came from the same humane shelter as Mandy. I was working and going to school full time so the right thing to say was that it probably wasn't the best time to have one dog let alone two. Instead, I thought Mandy would be happier by not being alone all the time I was at school or work; besides, I really wanted another dog. I was away a lot, but my hectic driving schedule made it pretty easy to stop at home frequently.
The shelter again had several beagles available. One was a very sweet beagle mixed with a little bit of basset. She was scheduled to be in the newspaper as one of their ad dogs in the near future. The policy of the shelter was that dogs in the news paper had to be available for a few weeks after being in the paper and then if there was multiple parties interested, there was a complicated choice system. Net, it would be many weeks, if I would have gotten her. Sammy on the other hand was the runt of a litter of sickly beagle pups that came in. All the other pups died shortly after being brought in but somehow Sammy did not, even though she was very small and had a hernia. I'm not sure how I could have said no to her.
After the usual hoops to jump through, I was able to pick her up on a late Friday. I didn't want her to have another weekend in the shelter, so I picked her up on the way to school for a night class. The temperature was such that she would be fine in the truck while I was in class, and it was scheduled to be a short class.
On the way to school, Sammy squirmed her way out of her cardboard box and jumped all over, the puppy that she was. Distracted by this, I locked my keys in the vehicle as I leaving for class. I had a friend who was a police officer at the school, he stopped by after I was able to call the security office. He made short order of the door with a slim jim and I got my keys. Luckily, Brandon did not see that I had a puppy in the car.
After class, I got back to my car. Not surprisingly, Sammy was not in her box. She had pooped in my truck as well. Luckily, it was a pretty awful truck with a plastic interior so clean-up was not an issue.
I went home and after the typical dog smelling, Mandy and Sammy quickly bonded. Sammy was probably the easiest dog to house train, likely because Mandy had learned the rules, and helped. I'm not sure if this is actually possible, but any time Sammy had an accident, Mandy barked like crazy, "Don't do that in the house! It makes 'em mad!"
Mandy and Sammy quickly became best friends. They slept most of the day in a small bed; there were actually two beds, but they were always in the same one. They shared food, but only out of different bowls. They fought about everything. Both dogs had split ears (Sammy's were far worse) from the fights, those long floppy beagle ears are very vulnerable. The fights only lasted a few minutes and were followed by dog-apologies. In one notable case after moving to Ohio, Sammy and Mandy were with me on the way home from running errands, with a stop for pigs ears at the pet store. The pig ears in the bag instigated a fight that ended up under the brake pedal. Luckily, it didn't turn out as poorly as it could have.
Sammy was definitely the trouble maker. The dog gates meant nothing to her. Two dog gates on top of each other meant nothing to her. There was nothing she couldn't find her way around or through. She learned to open cupboards to extract toys - blender, a full container of Crisco, dog food. I had to put child locks on all the cupboards for years because of her. Any door that was ajar was completely open to her deft paws.
In the apartment after moving to Ohio, Sammy and Mandy had to be tied up in the kitchen when home alone. Sammy found a way to open a drawer, climb on the counter, share the dog treats and go to the other side. Her leash was just long enough to not hang her and she dug through the drywall, creating a shelf to get a paw on, back onto the counter and to the correct side. Imagine the surprise when I came home to the dog treat jar talking (Snausages, Snausages...) a hole in the wall, and two innocent looking beagles. It was never a dull moment with her.
She loved the squirrels in the back yard. She would spend hours stalking them, wanting to come in and peer out the back door until they returned from the safety of the trees, to be let out and stalk them again. I don't remember her ever catching one, but she never tired of this as a young dog. Even as she got older she had a lust for all small mammals. I tried a couple times to take her to hunt bunnies, but she had an innate fear of guns. I let her run around while I unsuccessfully hunted. She was happier that way.
I got more beagles through the years, to a total of 4 for quite a while. Sammy got crabbier as she got older. Her perfect world was the two people in her life and Mandy, that's it. She tolerated some of the other dogs, notably Dixie, but had an obvious distaste for Lucky and Soda. She really didn't even like other people very much. In one case when there was a house full of people, Sammy broke the rules to go upstairs to get away from all the people. Unlike most of my dogs, she hated the vet, and kenneling was terrible for her.
Through all this Mandy and Sammy had a bond none of my other beagles have ever had. When Mandy died, I hung her collar from the rear view mirror in my truck where it remains today. A few weeks later, Sammy was in the truck and craned her neck to put her nose on the collar and smell it. A beagle always looks a little sad and Sammy was more expressive than most, but there is no doubt she missed Mandy.
Sammy aged like us all. She pursued small mammals less, and looked more for opportunities to sleep in a comfortable spot or sit by the kerosene heater in the winter. She started to go down hill quickly. A trip to the vet concluded her liver and kidneys were not acting normally. There were three options, expensive treatment which was likely to do little, put her down, or do nothing. She still had that Sammy spark, so I couldn't put her down. She hated the vet, so I didn't want to let her live her last few months as a permanent patient, I believe that is selfishly cruel to do to any dog. She went home and we tried to make her as comfortable as possible. A day or so before she died, she curled up on the couch with me, something she didn't do very often as getting on the couch was not easy for her. I'd like to believe it was her goodbye.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)